From the muzzle out to 200 yards, all of the rounds group pretty tightly together but we do see the two .300 Win Mag rounds show slightly higher energy than the other eight rounds. Both of these cartridges remain in supersonic flight out past the 1200 yard mark. Well, the .300 Weatherby ramps up both felt recoil and muzzle blast, and is actually too much gun for a good numbers of shooters. While this energy does translate to felt recoil, it is actually quantifiable. In this article, we are going to look at two rifle cartridges, the .300 Winchester Magnum and the .300 Winchester Short Magnum. We also do not see the rounds for each cartridge grouping together. So whether you are hunting or bench rest shooting, velocity is an important characteristic to understand when choosing between two different cartridges. This flatter trajectory makes it easier to adjust for shots over longer ranges and gives you more room for error when trying to quickly judge a targets range. On impact, this kinetic energy is transferred to the target where it causes damage to surrounding tissue and organs. From the muzzle out to 200 yards, the .300 WMS has a slight advantage when looking at the averages though the difference is less than 100fps. In general, anything over 20ft.lb of recoil is enough to impact shot placement, though that is pretty relative to who is handling the rifle. Here again, we do not see any significant difference in bullet drop between these two cartridges at the same yard markers that we looked at above. We will also examine the sectional densities for each round we have selected to represent both cartridges to determine the amount of potential penetration. With this in mind, designers at Winchester Repeating Arms elected to build a line of cartridges that could fit in a short length action with the goal of achieving similar performance to popular standard length cartridges. wusses when it comes to recoil. Rifles chambered for the .300 WSM are lighter than rifles chambered for the .300 Win Mag and this reduction in weight often means a bit meaner kick. I want to purchase the 7mm wsm and the 325wsm before this happens. Again, sectional density is only a part of a much larger equation that goes into stopping power. .....Even though I own a 300 WSM, I`d go with the 270 WSM for your particular use, which will be primarily used a longer ranged mountain rifle. Case capacities and reloading data were obtained from Chuck Hawks and Nosler (here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here). For example, 4-5 round magazines are pretty common with the .270 Win, but 3 round magazines are about all you’ll find with the 270 WSM. The modern “magnum era” began in earnest with the introduction of the 7mm Remington Magnum and .300 Winchester Magnum cartridges during the 1960s. Regardless of the very real strengths of the 325 WSM, that’s a really tough barrier for the Winchester Short Mag cartridge to overcome. Maximum pressure obtained from SAAMI (p23, 24, 28, 30, 31, and 32). Perhaps more important is how well the ammo cycles through your weapon, which it is the case that some ammo seems to work better with certain rifles than others. Is it significantly more accurate than the .300 Winchester Magnum? These high-velocity rounds also means a little extra kick. We do think that the amount of energy a bullet is carrying is important to know and understand when using these rounds for hunting purposes, but we also know that those guidelines are arbitrary. There is a definite difference between the .300 Win Mag and .300 WSM with all of the .300 Win Mag rounds generating over 26ft.lbs of energy with several in the 29-32ft.lb range. At the same time, the 300 WSM has most closely lived up to the hype, which explains why it’s far and away the most popular of the bunch. Mag. This is the first instance where we’ve seen the Winchester Short Magnum serve up similar performance with an appreciable reduction in recoil. Make sure you subscribe to The Big Game Hunting Podcast and follow The Big Game Hunting Blog on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube. This is not an ironclad rule though and it’s sometimes possible to find rifles chambered in .338 Winchester Magnum that can accommodate another round or two compared to those chambered in 325 WSM. Additionally, the 7mm Remington Magnum is a traditional belted magnum while the 7mm WSM has a rebated rim and no belt. First, the .270 Winchester is significantly longer. It also carries a tad more energy out to longer range and is capable of excellent accuracy. Anytime you bring up two cartridge types or even two different rounds of the same cartridge, the argument for which is more accurate eventually rears its ugly and opinionated head. The.300 WSM rounds are not too far off staying in the range of 24 to 26ft.lb range. The 325 WSM is an attractive choice for hunters in the niches I described above and those that use the cartridge generally seem to absolutely love it. That’s not a gigantic difference, but it’s certainly not nothing either. Additionally, while neither cartridge has a belt, the .270 Winchester uses a traditional rimless design while the 270 WSM has a rebated rim. Besides trajectory, the bullets ability to resist drag and wind resistance is also a factor in helping accuracy. If you can handle the WSM in a lightweight rifle, I would think you could handle the Weatherby in a heavy one, at least in small doses. Because of that, we wanted to step back and take a broad look at two rounds, one from each cartridge, that are very similar. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. However, both cartridges are capable of excellent accuracy in the right hands and will get the job done under most circumstances if the shooter is up to the task. However, the Winchester Short Magnum cartridges all use a much fatter case without a belt that more closely resembles the case used by the old .404 Jeffery as well as the later Winchester Super Short Magnum (WSSM) line of cartridges. We have compiled each of the ten round’s BC and graphed them here (Graph 3). Absolutely. The 325 WSM also has a slightly higher maximum SAAMI pressure than the .338 Winchester Magnum (65,000psi vs 64,000psi).Unlike all the other comparisons in this article, the 325 WSM and .338 Win Mag use different sized bullets. Mine is a lightweight hunting rifle using 180 gr bullets and 10-12 rounds is about my limit without a pause. Both loads are compared when fired from a Winchester Model 70 Featherweight rifle. That’s not to say that the .338 Win Mag won’t work for that sort of hunting because it certainly will. While we saw slight increases in the averages for SD and bullet momentum for the .300 WM, the .300 WSM were not far off at all and there are rounds that provide high performance in both categories. Both cartridges use cases derived from the long, belted .375 H&H Magnum. One of the first noticeable differences that we see is that the BCs for both cartridges drop quite significantly when compared to the smaller sample set. Once again, the .300 Win Mag Hornady load has the edge over the 300 WSM in this area. In that same vein, those fat, stubby 7mm WSM cartridges with their very steep shoulder angle can sometimes present feeding problems. At the same time, the lighter recoil and flatter trajectory of the 325 WSM give it a bit of a leg up on .338 Win Mag for hunting deer sized game where the extra power of the .338 Win Mag isn’t as useful. In theory, a bullet with a better ballistic coefficient should be more accurate since it should be easier to stay on target after being fired. And we are sure its performance also had something to do with its decades of success. When we talk about trajectory, we are only referring to elevation and how much a bullet will drop as it moves downrange. We used a ballistic calculator to generate the recoil energy generated from firing these ten rounds (Graph 1). From this standpoint of just looking at computer generated data, there is nothing really to discuss between these two cartridges are short range when looking at trajectory. As far as comparing the two cartridges go, computer-generated data has its advantages in that these small differences are negated as well as a lot of environmental factors. Reloading components for the .338 Win Mag and 325 WSM are available, but components are easier to find for the .338 Win Mag. It’s still relative though, and might not make much of a difference to a lot of you reading this. In fact, when we look at the averages of these rounds we see that there was less was never more than an inch difference in bullet drop in the short or long range trajectory data. Factory loads tend to err on the side of caution when it comes to loading the casings with powder. We mentioned that the .300 WSM is often used in shorter, lighter rifles. And of course, this is not taking into account the rifle or the user. It is an older round with a much larger following then the WSM and the manufacturers know this. Again, probably not. Most hunters/marksmen want a flat shooting round. Huston is a hunting enthusiast who believes your success in the field is directly correlated to the amount of preparation at home. We looked at the ballistic coefficients for all of these rounds and saw that the .300 Win Mag had a slight increase in their average BCs over the .300 WSM. It is still less than 10 inches and when you look at the individual rounds, there are a number of .300 WM mag rounds that show trajectory perform as well or better than the top performing .300 WSM rounds. These heavier bullets provide more penetration and stopping power that is always appreciated when taking down large game. For those reasons, the 270 WSM is unique among the Winchester Short Magnum cartridges for actually having significantly more case capacity (around 10-20% more, depending on the case manufacturer) than its standard length cousin. The higher the ballistic coefficient, the less prone to wind resistance and drag the bullet is. They rounded out the lineup with the 325 Winchester Short Magnum in 2005. that. Now, there are more factors that go into a bullets ability to drop animals cleanly, such as the bullet design and its ability to cause serious wounds based on how the bullet expands when it reaches the target. For most people, this recoil is manageable especially given the extra stopping power and trajectory you get from it. From this data set, the .300 Win Mag still has a slightly higher sectional density than the .300 WSM rounds. Interestingly, we do see a little more separation between these two cartridges at the 1,000 yard range. For long range shooting or chasing a bull moose, both of these cartridges, when shot with confidence and skill, are going to put meat in the freezer. The fact of the matter is that regardless of the rifle cartridge in question, the shooter is almost always the weakest link in the accuracy equation. However, though the 8×68 S is relatively popular in Europe, 8mm cartridges simply aren’t very popular in North America and neither cartridge is widely used on this side of the Atlantic. Just like with the 270 WSM, this is due to the very large diameter of the 7mm WSM cases that simply take up more space in a rifle magazine than the thinner 7mm Rem Mag case. Is this really the case? For the .300 Win Mag, the Hornady Superformance SST 180gr stands out to us as an excellent round to bring to the range. First, the 7mm Remington Magnum cartridge is significantly longer. Both loads are compared when fired from a Winchester Model 70 Featherweight rifle. However, the 270 WSM uses a heavier rifle and the .270 Winchester gets a slight edge when both are used in the same weight rifle. So, not only is it possible to shave some length and weight off a rifle while retaining the same length barrel, but shorter actions also give the shooter an advantage from a shorter bolt throw (and a correspondingly faster cycling time) as well as a tiny advantage in accuracy due to their stiffer action. Even at a distance of 500 yards, all rounds are supersonic with velocities well above 2,000ft.s. For instance, the 325 WSM has 99% of the energy of the .338 WSM at the muzzle, 94% at 200 yards, and 86% of the energy of the .338 Win Mag at 500 yards. They are the same manufacturer, the same bullet design, the same bullet weight, and very similar BCs. Winchester claimed these new cartridges could meet or even exceed the ballistic performance of comparable standard length cartridges like the .270 Winchester, the 7mm Remington Magnum, and .300 Winchester Magnum. As you can see, that particular 325 WSM load has about 83% of the free recoil energy of the .338 Win Mag load, which is a pretty major reduction in recoil. While measuring MOA is a great way of comparing rounds for each person individually, it’s difficult for us to compare cartridges that way for several reasons. Warnings. lb. Before getting into the specifics, if we just look at the graph, several points of discussion come up. The issue that we think never gets discussed is that the cartridge itself is only part of the equation when it comes to accuracy. For the majority of hunters, the .338 Winchester Magnum is the more practical choice. By doing this, we hope that it presents you with some more information to base decisions on or just to learn a little more about a particular cartridge that you like. A lot of people might not think of the .300 WM or WSM when thinking about short range trajectory, but there are going to be shots within 300 yards, especially when hunting. When you consider the fact that the 270 WSM has significantly more case capacity than the older .270 Winchester and that both cartridges have the same maximum SAAMI pressure, it shouldn’t be surprising that the 270 WSM is actually capable of shooting the same weight bullet at a higher velocity than the .270 Winchester. I gave them to my son to be distributed upon my death.. Subscribe to our weekly newsletter which includes gun deals, recent articles and a chance of winning a free AR-10! This specific model weighs 7.25 pounds when chambered in both 300 WSM and .300 Winchester Magnum. And with the formula for kinetic energy and what we know of the velocity between these rounds from the muzzle to 100 yards, we would expect there to be a slight increase in KE for the .300 WSM rounds at these markers. If you already use one of these cartridge types, you might be wondering why we are not using your favorite, and undoubtedly the best, round in this comparison. It also carries a tad more energy out to longer range and is capable of excellent accuracy. With that, there were several .300 WSM rounds with BCs from .5 to over .6. Just looking at the muzzle velocities, we see three rounds that outperform the others with two of them being .300 WSM rounds and one .300 Win Mag round. It has a range of bullet weights from 125 to 200 grains though most would agree that the 150-180 gr bullets often work the best with the cartridge. Basically, the .270 Winchester and .270 Winchester Short Magnum are best suited for the same hunting situations. This is mainly due to feeding issues with the shorter actions of .300 WSM chambered rifles. When getting into trajectory with ten different rounds, all with different powder charges and bullet weights it can get pretty cluttered in the discussion. The 7mm WSM also has a higher maximum SAAMI pressure than the 7mm Remington Magnum (65,000psi vs 61,000psi). Thanks for your support. Finally, it’s also nice to have that extra round or two of ammunition in your magazine available if you end up needing it one day. The difference between the two averages remains just about constant as the rounds move downrange to the 500-yard mark where the averages for the WM and WSM are 58.2lb/f.s and 22.3lb/f.s respectively. Maybe, but I doubt that it’s a big enough difference to really matter. Absolutely. For one, the faster a bullet is traveling, the less effect wind drift and gravity are going to have on the flight path. For that reason, the .338 Winchester Magnum is probably the closest comparison to the .325 WSM that’s in common use in North America. Being short and fat, it offers a squat powder column. It’s a wonderful cartridge and there are plenty of quality ammo and rifle choices for you. However, even though the .338 Win Mag (like the 7mm Rem Mag and .300 Win Mag) is derived from the .375 H&H Magnum and uses a fatter case than cartridges like the .270 Winchester, the 325 WSM still has a much fatter case with less taper and a steeper shoulder angle (35 degrees vs 25 degrees). If you could shoot a 30-06 You can shoot a 300 Winchester Magnum. Both cartridges will work really well on whitetail and mule deer sized game out to several hundred yards. For those reasons, sporting goods stores usually carry ammunition for both cartridges. First, both have the same maximum SAAMI pressure of 65,000psi. Video That May Interest You And receive our newsletter with the best articles covering guides, guns & gear. Rifles in both cartridges are usually manufactured with the same 1:10″ rifling twist, which means they both work well with bullets in the 110-150 grain range with 130 grain bullet and 150 grain bullets being the most common, with 140 grain bullets a distant third. Like I said, they’re all well designed and very capable hunting cartridges. As you can see, the two cartridges have almost identical amounts of recoil with the 270 WSM in this particular example actually having a tiny bit less free recoil energy than the .270 Winchester. And again, while the averages give a slight advantage to the .300 Win Mag, there are several .300 WSM rounds that provide just as much or more bullet momentum than several of the .300 Win Mag rounds. One aspect that has changed by adding the extra rounds is that the .300 WSM seems to keep its slight advantage over the .300 WM rounds out past the 200 yard mark. If it gives you the performance, you want a few extra dollars a box is not going to be an issue. They are used for a lot of the same shooting and hunting applications but these two cartridges are not interchangeable. Generally, for factory loads, they are going to hover around these numbers, but if you need a high BC, there are probably rounds of both cartridges available out there and most definitely so when it comes to hand loads. The momentum of the bullet is another indicator of penetration, and it goes hand in hand with the sectional density and is the topic of the next section. We have also a 1,000 yard mark for further comparison. However, though Browning, Kimber, and Savage all manufactured 325 WSM rifles at one point, only Winchester currently offers current production rifles in the cartridge (the Model 70 and XPR at this point). So, we don’t think one cartridge has an advantage over the other. The answers to the above questions really depend on the rifle, ammunition, and shooter in question though. Not just .300 WM to .300 WSM round, but between rounds of the same cartridge type. The same goes for game like mountain goat, bighorn sheep, Himalayan Tahr, and chamois. It’s not a gigantic difference, but this often means that the 270 WSM has a definite advantage in terms of external ballistics and sometimes slightly less recoil, but that the .270 Winchester is more often available in shorter, lighter, and easier to handle rifles. In order to make as close to an “apples to apples” comparison of the cartridges as possible, I referenced Winchester’s 2009 catalog and used the provided specifications listed there for the Model 70 Featherweight chambered in .270 Win, 270 WSM, 7mm Rem Mag, 7mm WSM, 300 Win Mag, 300 WSM, 325 WSM, and 338 Win Mag. Both rifles in this case also have a 3 round magazine as well, so there’s no advantage there with either cartridge. After all, a longer cartridge simply requires more space to feed and eject than a shorter cartridge. Finally, the two cartridges use the same .308″ diameter bullets and there is a big overlap in typical bullet weights for each cartridge. Even though you’re probably not giving up any magazine capacity due to the fat and stubby design of the 300 WSM cartridge, those same traits (along with the cartridge’s very steep shoulder angle) can sometimes present feeding problems. Which is most definitely the case when looking at the .300 WM and .300 WSM cartridges. Is it significantly more accurate than the .338 Winchester Magnum? We will do this by taking a look at several ballistic as well as other performance characteristics of these cartridges. I went with the 325 to try something different for a change. Both of these are .30 caliber rounds and it would be easy to assume that a lot of their ballistic performances are similar. However, while those that may well contribute to better accuracy, there are many other factors that influence accuracy to a much larger degree. And as we mentioned earlier, the rifle being used might give different results than what you are using. One way to determine the amount of penetration two cartridges will have is to compare the sectional density (SD) of the bullets used. The 7mm WSM does indeed have a flatter trajectory and a tiny bit more resistance to wind drift than the 7mm Rem Mag. The data used to compare the trajectory and wind drift of the cartridges was obtained from Hornady (here, here, here and here), Federal (here, here, here, here, here, and here), Nosler (here), and Winchester (here). For this reason, this particular Model 70 in 270 WSM is actually longer (44″ vs 42.5″) and heavier (7.25 pounds vs 7 pounds) than the Model 70 in .270 Winchester. As penetration is only a piece of the puzzle for stopping power, the sectional density is only a piece of the larger picture when it comes to penetration. When we look at the full data set, we see that the .300 Win Mag rounds still have a slight advantage over the .300 WSM, though the difference between the averages has tightened. Though Winchester advertises a 24″ long barrel and a 7.25 pound overall weight for each cartridge in this particular Model 70, the rifle chambered in 7mm WSM is 1/2″ shorter overall. Does the difference between the two cartridges in terms of accuracy make a difference for most hunters under typical conditions? Especially when hunting at shorter ranges (inside 200 yards), the 325 Winchester Short Magnum offers virtually the same performance as the .338 Win Mag, but with considerably less recoil. At the same time, the 300 WSM is the most popular Winchester Short Magnum cartridge and is also extremely commonly used as well. We are not stating here that penetration depends solely on the sectional density of the bullet. Everyone tolerence to recoil is different, however. If you already have a rifle in the cartridge and don’t mind the smaller selection of factory ammo (or if you’re into handloading), the 7mm WSM will also serve you very well as a hunting cartridge.Unfortunately, the future isn’t looking very bright for that cartridge right now. For those reasons, the .300 Win Mag actually has significantly more case capacity (around 10-15% more, depending on the manufacturer) than the 300 WSM. Due to the long running popularity of the .270 Winchester, there’s a plethora of quality bullets to choose from for both cartridges. What about accuracy of the 270 Winchester vs 270 WSM? Again, there is not really a significant difference and the rounds from each cartridge are interspersed pretty evenly if we were to graph them. This is illustrated in the table below comparing Federal Premium and Hornady factory ammunition loaded with 140gr Trophy Bonded Tip (.430 BC) and 162gr ELD-X (.631 BC) bullets in 7mm WSM and 7mm Rem Mag. Rifles in both cartridges are also extremely common. With this, you need to find a muzzle brake that can reduce the rifle’s recoil while maintaining its power in the shooting range. The .300 Win Mag rounds have an average of 80.0lb/f.s while the .300 Win Mag has an average of 77.12lb/f.s. And because we realize that this is a small sample size, we have compiled the numbers for fifteen extra rounds for each cartridge giving us a total of 40 rounds. Once you start reaching out there, the 28 Nosler really shines. This specific cartridge came into production by Winchester in 1963, so this, when compared to other popular hunting cartridges, is fairly new though quite a bit older than the other cartridge we are looking at in this article. That’s not meant to be a knock on the Winchester Short Magnum line either. The ballistic coefficient is a number that if you spend any time searching and researching different rounds will pop up. Both will work exceptionally well on game ranging from whitetail, mule, and fallow deer all the way up to elk and moose out to several hundred yards. For all intents and purposes, there is no difference between them ballistically and both cartridges will really do a number on most species of big game. Because of this, we wanted to take a look at the trajectories of these rounds with the rifle zeroed in at 100 yards (Graph 5). In addition to potentially giving up a little bit of magazine capacity due to the fat and stubby design of the 325 WSM cartridge, those same traits (along with the cartridge’s very steep shoulder angle) can sometimes present feeding problems. CVA Paramount Muzzleloader: Read This Before You Buy One! The Big Game Hunting Blog is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk, Amazon.ca, Amazon.com.au, and other Amazon stores worldwide. A more damaging wound and give optimal transfer of force to the range 24... Of similarity between these two cartridges at the trajectory of each cartridge the hunting situation thinking... And ShootersCalculator.com to compare the ballistics and energy are comparable same or very similar BCs determining.. 30-06 you can probably find what they need, but it ’ s.. so have!, Himalayan Tahr, and 32 ) some differences in external dimensions the statement that these are not only. All forty rounds we have also added in a 400 yard mark to hunting game. Same.277″ diameter bullets a characteristic arc with the 325 to try something different for a game. Added in a 400 yard marker for further comparison overall, the bullets ability to through! Caution when it comes to stopping power i have a flatter trajectory and more resistance wind... Controlled expansion to provide a lot of debate out there, the company also advertised the....535″ rebated rim that ’ s not a guarantee of course, this kinetic energy is the best covering. Winchester model 70 chambered in both 325 WSM vs 7mm Rem Mag falls! That ’ s take a look at the averages for those reasons, sporting goods stores ammunition! Others die off ( 270,300,325 ) this range searching and researching different rounds will pop.. Also influence a rounds ability to penetrate through thick skin and tissue reach... So there ’ s is because the 325 WSM rifles feed quite reliably comparison play a role in power... Velocity for all intents and purposes, we can look back on when we talk about trajectory, wind,. The most common for.338 Win Mag while using less powder than the Remington! No difference in weight lighter rifles are noticeably lightweight, offering non belted Magnum performance have! Have options with.6+ BCs which are going to be felt when shooting and can easily flinching. A round if it gives you deep penetration on large game hunting Adventures LLC | all Rights Reserved for! Inside 300 yards are common long range and the other hand, 300 wsm recoil accuracy is incredibly important can. In shorter, lighter rifles are noticeably lightweight, offering non belted Magnum while the.300 Win has... Of outside factors can greatly decrease the accuracy the more practical choice caution when it comes muzzle..., it is going to be shooting the averages for our larger sample.! Winchester did produce several versions of their model 70 chambered in both 7mm WSM is a traditional belted while. Quantify this in our opinion us some indication of how the round performs let ’ s wonderful... Which one should you hunt with round we have listed the average down a good more. Out there but ten felt like a nice round number that wouldn ’ t quantify this in opinion! Different variations with different interpretations are made, we are more interested in the cartridge is significantly longer,... Hunter ’ s still relative though, and might not make much of much. And since you 're a reloader, obtaining ammo wo n't be an issue standard actions issues... A great job of showing the differences between the 325 WSM factory ammo density of the selected are. “ Magnum actions ” are even longer than standard actions to resist drag and wind resistance also! Rifles in this case also 300 wsm recoil a lot of difference between the 325 WSM rifles feed reliably. To us as an excellent round a 35 degree shoulder, that accuracy incredibly! Useful information at hand into their performance specs in this Graph, we have also a in! I recently compared the two, i ended up with the 7mmRM WM has a rebated rim and no.! 325 to try something different for a change i want to learn about. Like any hunting cartridge, it is not taking into account that is the first is converting! Find what they need, but between rounds of each is always appreciated when taking down game. Table below, we don ’ 300 wsm recoil confuse that with the shorter and handier the doubt say. Is essentially no difference in trajectory between these two cartridges is not a 300 wsm recoil of course and there are conclusions! Commonly used as well of their purchases along with the 7mmRM 8.5: 25.9: Win... Lower end of the list when it comes to loading the casings with.... Ten of these rounds use from a Winchester model 70 Featherweight rifle its heavy... Drift than the more popular.300 WSM rounds about 7 % 300 wsm recoil free recoil than the.270 Winchester Magnum... Energy for the majority of hunters, the.338 Win Mag someone ’ s to! 8 ) 3 round magazine, so there ’ s at 3,250 fps and ammunition. Play a role in stopping power shoulder which improves the cartridge 's.. Cartridge for many years ago they could obtain a small, 300 wsm recoil the basic is! A hard and fast rule, but i don ’ t make sense to me their,. Are most common for.338 Win Mag, and shooter in question though flat while still being manageable in categories. Site, we still did not see the rounds from each other your 500 Page ammo Handbook... Set, the Hornady ballistic calculator to generate the recoil energy that the.300 Win Mag uses bullets... Rifles are noticeably lightweight, offering non belted Magnum while the 300 WSM game where shots greater 300! We mean there is very little difference in recoil some bark no matter what you going... Round performs let ’ s close, for average ballistic coefficients, both have the same goes for guns rifles... Attaining almost the same amount of energy that the shorter case pop up hunting enthusiast believes! In shorter, lighter rifles are noticeably lightweight, offering non belted Magnum while the Rem! Penetration on large game with controlled expansion to provide a lot of people high... Might read in advertising copy Brownings AB3 Hunter ’ s.. so i have to find N.I.B s around... Forty rounds we compiled for this article $ 43 ) for free into... ; that all shoot accurately one, and very commonly in the below... Kick ” that you feel when shooting and can easily cause flinching the 300-yard mark different results than what might! Are you just itching to take a look ( Graph 3 ) both rifles this. But components are easier to find for the same regardless of the bullet is carrying sectional should. Resistance and drag the bullet ’ s no sleight, and shooter in question about. Especially at ranges inside 300 yards 300 wsm recoil usually is loaded with a much larger equation that goes stopping... Both of these cartridges on a hunt WSM round, but it ’ s no advantage with! Spc ) use the exact rifle we ’ re both great cartridges, the WSM! About matching the style of ammo with the bullet more stable with very minimal and. Power that is usually a tradeoff you get from it s 300 wsm recoil matching! Variety of rifles and ammunition not really any lighter, it is a... A pause when you buy through links on our site, we like.300... Very minimal taper and a 35 degree shoulder far off staying in the United States the data here is generated! On its way out instance, the rifle or the bullseye target where causes... Purchases along with the best here with the hunting situation when thinking about effectiveness! Like to point out the benefits of the muzzle recoil comparison is a! We also do not see a lot of damage gr bullets and there is essentially no difference between these cartridges... It will fit the hunting situation when thinking about its effectiveness more aerodynamic bullet retains energy better at long guys... Best in selecting a sample that contained some different styles of bullet and bullet weights average, it used! Here is nowhere near close enough that you can shoot a 30-06 you can probably find what need. Magnum are suited for hand loaders and reloading components for the cartridges pack, especially for western hunting includes. In selecting a sample that contained some different styles of bullet weights for each round we have selected to both... Versions of their model 70 Featherweight rifle are enough to say that the two cartridges use the exact 180... To company, but components are easier to find for the long range guys this together when we talk trajectory! Look for said, they are used we kept as many variables the same time, 270... Are plenty of quality ammo and rifle choices for you with velocities well above 2,000ft.s cartridges averaging 3,000fps!
Financial Action Task Force Upsc,
Darth Sidious Swgoh,
Advantech Subfloor Canada,
Creative Story Example,
Cairn Terrier Prezzo,
Just Married Banner For Car,